Aikido Security vs Cycode for AI code security
ANSWER FIRST
Aikido Security scores 3.0 and Cycode 3.7 on our AI code security criteria, so Cycode ranks higher on the published weights. Aikido leads on developer experience and pricing and buying clarity; Cycode leads on AI code and assistant coverage, endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, governance and policy control and remediation and ASPM depth. The widest gap is pricing and buying clarity, where Aikido scores 5.0 against 1.5.
Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026
How do Aikido Security and Cycode score side by side?
| Criterion | Weight | Aikido Security | Cycode | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage of AI-generated code and AI coding assistants | 25% | 3.0 | 4.5 | Cycode |
| Endpoint deployment and tamper resistance | 20% | 2.0 | 3.0 | Cycode |
| Governance and policy control for the CISO | 20% | 1.5 | 4.0 | Cycode |
| Developer experience and low friction | 15% | 4.5 | 3.5 | Aikido |
| Pricing and buying clarity | 10% | 5.0 | 1.5 | Aikido |
| Remediation and ASPM depth | 10% | 4.0 | 5.0 | Cycode |
| Weighted total | 3.0 | 3.7 |
Aikido Security leads on 2 criteria, Cycode leads on 4, and 0 are tied.
Aikido Security
diff --verdict aikido-security · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:Flat prices published: Developer $0 (2 users), Basic $300 a month and Pro $600 a month with 10 users included. [source]
- Strength:Free plan includes SCA, SAST, AI SAST and secrets. [source]
- Strength:Free IDE plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. [source]
- Strength:Aikido Safe Chain blocks malware at package install. [source]
@@ limitations @@
Cycode
diff --verdict cycode · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:IDE guardrails intercept secrets, file context, prompts and tool calls before they reach AI services. [source]
- Strength:AI-BOM tracks .cursorrules and .windsurfrules files, MCP servers and AI API keys, with commit provenance. [source]
- Strength:AI Exploitability Agent confirms CVE reachability; AI Fix Agent produces PR-ready fixes. [source]
- Strength:Full scanner set: SAST, SCA, secrets, containers, IaC and CI/CD posture. [source]
- Strength:Cycode's AI Guardrails names Claude Code and Cursor. [source]
@@ limitations @@
- Limitation:No prices published; pricing is based on active developers and AI usage. [source]
How do Aikido Security and Cycode cover AI code and coding assistants?
Aikido Security: The free IDE plugin scans for SAST issues and secrets in VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf; no agent, model or MCP discovery is described.
Cycode: The AI inventory covers code assistants such as GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf and Tabnine, plus MCP servers, models and AI secrets, alongside SAST, SCA, secrets, container and IaC scanning. IDE hooks support Cursor and Claude Code so far.
Assistants named on their public pages: Aikido Security: Cursor and Windsurf; Cycode: Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Windsurf.
Where do their controls run on the developer machine?
Aikido Security: An IDE plugin plus Aikido Safe Chain, which blocks malware at package install; no endpoint agent for coding agents.
Cycode: IDE hooks enforce guardrails such as "Block Unauthorized MCPs" and "Restrict MCP Execution to Localhost Only", starting with Cursor and Claude Code; an endpoint agent and tamper resistance are not described.
How much control does the security team get?
Aikido Security: No agent inventory, MCP governance or agent policy controls are described.
Cycode: Three-state authorization (Needs Review, Authorized, Unauthorized) with violations for AI tools and MCP servers; an audit log of agent activity is not described.
How do they fit the developer's workflow?
Aikido Security: Free IDE plugin and AutoFix pull requests.
Cycode: IDE and MCP presence and a free trial, but no free tier.
How do they fix and prioritize findings?
Aikido Security: AutoFix proposes fixes as pull requests, with SCA reachability and EPSS-based prioritization.
Cycode: An AI Exploitability Agent checks reachability, an AI Fix and Remediation Agent produces PR-ready fixes, and Maestro orchestrates 120+ connectors through ConnectorX.
How do they compare on price?
Aikido Security: free tier: Yes: Developer plan, $0, 2 users; lowest published paid option: Basic $350 a month, 10 users included (Pro $700, Advanced $1,050); pricing unit: Flat fee per plan.
Cycode: free tier: No (free trial offered); lowest published paid option: Contact sales; pricing unit: Active developers and AI usage.
Source: Aikido Security pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: Cycode pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Aikido Security if pricing and buying clarity and developer experience matter most: Aikido scores 5.0 and 4.5 there, against 1.5 and 3.5 for Cycode. Choose Cycode if remediation and ASPM depth and AI code and assistant coverage matter most: Cycode scores 5.0 and 4.5 there, against 4.0 and 3.0 for Aikido.
Frequently asked questions
Is Aikido Security or Cycode better for AI code security?
Aikido Security scores 3.0 and Cycode 3.7 on our AI code security criteria, so Cycode ranks higher on the published weights. Aikido leads on 2 of 6 criteria and Cycode on 4; 0 are tied. Which is better depends on which criteria matter most to you; the calculator on this site re-weights them.
How do Aikido Security and Cycode price their plans?
Aikido Security: free tier: Yes: Developer plan, $0, 2 users; lowest published paid option: Basic $350 a month, 10 users included (Pro $700, Advanced $1,050). Cycode: free tier: No (free trial offered); lowest published paid option: Contact sales. Prices as published on vendor pages and marketplace listings, reviewed 2026-10-11.
Which AI coding assistants do Aikido Security and Cycode name?
On the pages we reviewed, Aikido Security names Cursor and Windsurf and Cycode names Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Windsurf. 'Not named' means we did not find the assistant on the vendor's pages; it does not prove the tool cannot work with it.
Read the full reviews
Where next?
- Aikido Security alternatives
- Cycode alternatives
- Compare Aikido Security and Cycode with other tools
- Re-weight the criteria in the calculator
More head-to-heads
- Legit Security vs Cycode
- Legit Security vs Aikido Security
- Cycode vs Snyk
- Aikido Security vs Snyk
- Backslash Security vs Cycode
- Aikido Security vs Backslash Security
Sources reviewed
Cycode
Last reviewed October 2026. Editorial assessment from public vendor material; no hands-on testing.