Scores higher than Endor Labs on: endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (5.0 vs 2.5), pricing and buying clarity (2.5 vs 2.0) and remediation and ASPM depth (5.0 vs 4.5)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: developer experience (4.0 vs 3.5)
ANSWER FIRST
On our October 2026 scores, the highest-ranked alternatives to Endor Labs are Legit Security (4.4), Snyk (4.1) and Backslash Security (3.9). Endor Labs scores 3.9 (rank t-3 of 10); 2 of the 10 alternatives score higher overall. The criterion where Endor Labs trails most is pricing and buying clarity, led by Aikido Security at 5.0.
Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026
These points come from Endor Labs's own public pages as reviewed in October 2026. They describe what is and is not published, not user complaints.
Prices for the Core and Pro plans are not published; only the plan names and the seat definition (contributors with commits in the last 90 days) are.
Source: endorlabs.com · Reviewed Sep 2026
The free Developer tier runs locally only; policies, the UI and scan history need a paid Core or Pro plan.
Source: endorlabs.com · Reviewed Sep 2026
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (5.0 vs 2.5), pricing and buying clarity (2.5 vs 2.0) and remediation and ASPM depth (5.0 vs 4.5)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: developer experience (4.0 vs 3.5)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (3.0 vs 2.5), developer experience (4.5 vs 4.0) and pricing and buying clarity (3.5 vs 2.0)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: governance and policy control (4.5 vs 4.0) and remediation and ASPM depth (4.5 vs 4.0)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (4.0 vs 2.5) and governance and policy control (5.0 vs 4.5)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 4.5), developer experience (4.0 vs 3.0) and remediation and ASPM depth (4.5 vs 3.0)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: pricing and buying clarity (2.5 vs 2.0)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 4.5) and developer experience (4.0 vs 3.5)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (3.0 vs 2.5) and remediation and ASPM depth (5.0 vs 4.5)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 4.5), governance and policy control (4.5 vs 4.0), developer experience (4.0 vs 3.5) and pricing and buying clarity (2.0 vs 1.5)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (3.0 vs 2.5), developer experience (4.5 vs 4.0) and pricing and buying clarity (4.0 vs 2.0)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 3.5), governance and policy control (4.5 vs 2.5) and remediation and ASPM depth (4.5 vs 4.0)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: remediation and ASPM depth (5.0 vs 4.5)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 4.5), governance and policy control (4.5 vs 3.5), developer experience (4.0 vs 3.0) and pricing and buying clarity (2.0 vs 1.0)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: no criterion
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 4.0), governance and policy control (4.5 vs 3.0) and developer experience (4.0 vs 3.5)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: developer experience (4.5 vs 4.0) and pricing and buying clarity (4.5 vs 2.0)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 3.0), endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (2.5 vs 1.5), governance and policy control (4.5 vs 2.0) and remediation and ASPM depth (4.5 vs 3.5)
Scores higher than Endor Labs on: developer experience (4.5 vs 4.0) and pricing and buying clarity (5.0 vs 2.0)
Endor Labs stays ahead on: AI code and assistant coverage (5.0 vs 3.0), endpoint deployment and tamper resistance (2.5 vs 2.0), governance and policy control (4.5 vs 1.5) and remediation and ASPM depth (4.5 vs 4.0)
| Tool | Free tier | Lowest published paid price | Pricing unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endor Labs | Yes: Developer tier, local, no account | Contact sales | Contributors with commits in the last 90 days | www.endorlabs.com |
| Legit Security | No (free trial on request) | AWS Marketplace: $60,000 for 12 months, all modules, 100 users (marketplace price) | Users (marketplace bundle) | aws.amazon.com |
| Snyk | Yes: Free, $0 | Team from $25 a month (up to 10 developers) | Enterprise credits (1 credit = $1) | snyk.io |
| Backslash Security | No (free read-only AI Endpoint Exposure Assessment) | AWS Marketplace: $75,000 annual commit, 12 months (marketplace price) | Annual commit | aws.amazon.com |
| OX Security | Yes: free use up to 9 developer contributions | Contact sales | AI user, contributing developer, cloud asset, agent hours | www.ox.security |
| Cycode | No (free trial offered) | Contact sales | Active developers and AI usage | cycode.com |
| Semgrep | Yes: up to 10 contributors | $30 per contributor per month (Code or Supply Chain); $15 (Secrets) | Contributor | semgrep.dev |
| Apiiro | No (AutoFix free for open source maintainers) | Contact sales | Not published | apiiro.com |
| Wiz Code | Not stated | AWS Marketplace: $58,500 for 100 licenses, 12 months, add-on for Wiz Cloud (marketplace price) | Licenses | aws.amazon.com |
| GitHub Advanced Security | Free for public repositories (code scanning, secret scanning, Dependabot alerts) | $19 (Secret Protection) or $30 (Code Security) per active committer per month | Active committer | github.com |
| Aikido Security | Yes: Developer plan, $0, 2 users | Basic $350 a month, 10 users included (Pro $700, Advanced $1,050) | Flat fee per plan | www.aikido.dev |
Stay with Endor Labs if reachability is how you want findings ranked. It reports on the code paths an application actually reaches across dependencies, containers and first-party code, and AURI inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills and applies policy at the moment of action.
Endor Labs leads or ties the lead on AI code and assistant coverage.
On our scores, Legit Security is the highest-ranked alternative at 4.4 out of 5, ahead of Endor Labs at 3.9. It scores higher than Endor Labs on endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, pricing and buying clarity and remediation and ASPM depth.
Snyk (Free, $0), OX Security (free use up to 9 developer contributions), Semgrep (up to 10 contributors), GitHub Advanced Security (Free for public repositories (code scanning, secret scanning, Dependabot alerts)) and Aikido Security (Developer plan, $0, 2 users) publish a free tier. Limits differ, so check each vendor's pricing page.
Legit Security (5.0), Snyk (3.0), Backslash Security (4.0), Cycode (3.0) and Semgrep (3.0) score 3.0 or higher on endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, the criterion that carries 20% of our score.