{}Best AI Code Security

Aikido Security vs OX Security for AI code security

ANSWER FIRST

Aikido Security scores 3.0 and OX Security 3.8 on our AI code security criteria, so OX Security ranks higher on the published weights. Aikido leads on developer experience and pricing and buying clarity; OX leads on AI code and assistant coverage, endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, governance and policy control and remediation and ASPM depth. The widest gap is governance and policy control, where OX scores 4.5 against 1.5.

Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026

How do Aikido Security and OX Security score side by side?

Aikido Security and OX Security: editorial assessment, 0-5. Last reviewed October 2026.
CriterionWeightAikido SecurityOX SecurityEdge
Coverage of AI-generated code and AI coding assistants25%3.04.5OX
Endpoint deployment and tamper resistance20%2.02.5OX
Governance and policy control for the CISO20%1.54.5OX
Developer experience and low friction15%4.53.5Aikido
Pricing and buying clarity10%5.02.5Aikido
Remediation and ASPM depth10%4.04.5OX
Weighted total3.03.8

Aikido Security leads on 2 criteria, OX Security leads on 4, and 0 are tied.

Aikido Security

Verdict for Aikido Security: strengths and limitations

diff --verdict aikido-security · reviewed 2026-09

@@ strengths @@

  • Strength:Flat prices published: Developer $0 (2 users), Basic $300 a month and Pro $600 a month with 10 users included. [source]
  • Strength:Free plan includes SCA, SAST, AI SAST and secrets. [source]
  • Strength:Free IDE plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. [source]
  • Strength:Aikido Safe Chain blocks malware at package install. [source]

@@ limitations @@

  • Limitation:No agent inventory, MCP governance or agent policy controls on the pages reviewed. [source]
  • Limitation:Free IDE scanning covers JavaScript, TypeScript and Python only. [source]

OX Security

Verdict for OX Security: strengths and limitations

diff --verdict ox-security · reviewed 2026-09

@@ strengths @@

  • Strength:VibeSec analyzes the developer's prompt and sends security guidance to the agent before code is generated. [source]
  • Strength:Supports Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro and VS Code with Copilot. [source]
  • Strength:Malicious dependency blocking, secret protection, AI inventory and an agent activity log. [source]
  • Strength:Pricing unit published for each product, including per AI user for VibeSec. [source]

@@ limitations @@

  • Limitation:No prices published. [source]
  • Limitation:Limits of the free sign-up are not published. [source]

How do Aikido Security and OX Security cover AI code and coding assistants?

Aikido Security: The free IDE plugin scans for SAST issues and secrets in VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf; no agent, model or MCP discovery is described.

OX Security: VibeSec supports Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro and VS Code with Copilot and analyzes the prompt before code is generated; the Agent AI BOM lists MCP servers, external SaaS and AI models with their users.

Assistants named on their public pages: Aikido Security: Cursor and Windsurf; OX Security: Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Kiro.

Where do their controls run on the developer machine?

Aikido Security: An IDE plugin plus Aikido Safe Chain, which blocks malware at package install; no endpoint agent for coding agents.

OX Security: Runs as a VS Code extension, a JetBrains plugin and an MCP integration; an endpoint application and tamper resistance are not described.

How much control does the security team get?

Aikido Security: No agent inventory, MCP governance or agent policy controls are described.

OX Security: Allow or block specific MCP tools, SaaS integrations and models, with an Agent Activity Log of prompts and tool calls and a history of prevented risks.

How do they fit the developer's workflow?

Aikido Security: Free IDE plugin and AutoFix pull requests.

OX Security: VS Code extension, JetBrains plugin and MCP integration, and free use for up to 9 developer contributions.

How do they fix and prioritize findings?

Aikido Security: AutoFix proposes fixes as pull requests, with SCA reachability and EPSS-based prioritization.

OX Security: One-click AI fixes in CI/CD, IDEs and pull requests with diffs, ASPM correlation, and an Agentic Pentester that ties exploitable issues back to code.

How do they compare on price?

Aikido Security: free tier: Yes: Developer plan, $0, 2 users; lowest published paid option: Basic $350 a month, 10 users included (Pro $700, Advanced $1,050); pricing unit: Flat fee per plan.

OX Security: free tier: Yes: free use up to 9 developer contributions; lowest published paid option: Contact sales; pricing unit: AI user, contributing developer, cloud asset, agent hours.

Source: Aikido Security pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Source: OX Security pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Which should you choose?

Choose Aikido Security if pricing and buying clarity and developer experience matter most: Aikido scores 5.0 and 4.5 there, against 2.5 and 3.5 for OX. Choose OX Security if AI code and assistant coverage and governance and policy control matter most: OX scores 4.5 and 4.5 there, against 3.0 and 1.5 for Aikido.

Frequently asked questions

Is Aikido Security or OX Security better for AI code security?

Aikido Security scores 3.0 and OX Security 3.8 on our AI code security criteria, so OX Security ranks higher on the published weights. Aikido leads on 2 of 6 criteria and OX on 4; 0 are tied. Which is better depends on which criteria matter most to you; the calculator on this site re-weights them.

How do Aikido Security and OX Security price their plans?

Aikido Security: free tier: Yes: Developer plan, $0, 2 users; lowest published paid option: Basic $350 a month, 10 users included (Pro $700, Advanced $1,050). OX Security: free tier: Yes: free use up to 9 developer contributions; lowest published paid option: Contact sales. Prices as published on vendor pages and marketplace listings, reviewed 2026-10-11.

Which AI coding assistants do Aikido Security and OX Security name?

On the pages we reviewed, Aikido Security names Cursor and Windsurf and OX Security names Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Kiro. 'Not named' means we did not find the assistant on the vendor's pages; it does not prove the tool cannot work with it.

Read the full reviews

Where next?

More head-to-heads

Sources reviewed

Last reviewed October 2026. Editorial assessment from public vendor material; no hands-on testing.