Backslash Security vs Endor Labs for AI code security
ANSWER FIRST
Backslash Security and Endor Labs share a displayed score of 3.9; on the exact weighted total Endor Labs is ahead, 3.900 against 3.875. Backslash leads on endpoint deployment and tamper resistance and governance and policy control; Endor Labs leads on AI code and assistant coverage, developer experience and remediation and ASPM depth; they tie on pricing and buying clarity. The widest gap is endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, where Backslash scores 4.0 against 2.5.
Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026
How do Backslash Security and Endor Labs score side by side?
| Criterion | Weight | Backslash Security | Endor Labs | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage of AI-generated code and AI coding assistants | 25% | 4.5 | 5.0 | Endor Labs |
| Endpoint deployment and tamper resistance | 20% | 4.0 | 2.5 | Backslash |
| Governance and policy control for the CISO | 20% | 5.0 | 4.5 | Backslash |
| Developer experience and low friction | 15% | 3.0 | 4.0 | Endor Labs |
| Pricing and buying clarity | 10% | 2.0 | 2.0 | Tie |
| Remediation and ASPM depth | 10% | 3.0 | 4.5 | Endor Labs |
| Weighted total | 3.9 | 3.9 |
Backslash Security leads on 2 criteria, Endor Labs leads on 3, and 1 is tied.
Backslash Security
diff --verdict backslash-security · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:Discovers every AI agent, MCP server, skill and plug-in across enterprise endpoints. [source]
- Strength:Policies scoped by user, team, endpoint or component, with inline blocking before execution. [source]
- Strength:Forensics and audit evidence for the EU AI Act, NIS2, DORA and SOC 2. [source]
@@ limitations @@
Endor Labs
diff --verdict endor-labs · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:Reachability analysis across dependencies, containers and first-party code. [source]
- Strength:AURI inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills and applies policy at the moment of action. [source]
- Strength:MCP server for Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with Copilot, Codex and Antigravity. [source]
- Strength:Free Developer tier runs locally with no account. [source]
@@ limitations @@
How do Backslash Security and Endor Labs cover AI code and coding assistants?
Backslash Security: Discovers "every AI agent, MCP server, Skill and plug-in" across enterprise endpoints, and its AWS Marketplace listing covers IDEs, CLIs, agents, MCP servers and LLMs, naming Cursor, Windsurf and GitHub Copilot. No public support list names Claude Code or Codex.
Endor Labs: AURI inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills, and the MCP server installs into Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with Copilot, Codex and Antigravity. AI SAST traces dataflow across repositories and pull requests.
Assistants named on their public pages: Backslash Security: Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Windsurf; Endor Labs: Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex.
Where do their controls run on the developer machine?
Backslash Security: Positioned as "securing the agentic endpoint", with inline blocking before execution across enterprise endpoints and an MCP proxy; tamper resistance is not described.
Endor Labs: Runs locally through an MCP server (npx endorctl ai-tools mcp-server) and AURI agents that run inside Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex and Google Antigravity on customer infrastructure; an endpoint application and tamper resistance are not described.
How much control does the security team get?
Backslash Security: Policies scoped by user, team, endpoint or component, inline blocking, and forensics and audit evidence for the EU AI Act, NIS2, DORA and SOC 2.
Endor Labs: AURI applies policy at the moment of action with an audit trail, and mutating agent actions sit behind approval gates; scoping policy by team or machine is not described.
How do they fit the developer's workflow?
Backslash Security: No free product tier or self-serve start; a free, read-only AI Endpoint Exposure Assessment is offered.
Endor Labs: The free Developer tier runs locally with no account.
How do they fix and prioritize findings?
Backslash Security: The AppGraph engine runs SAST, SCA and secrets scanning; fix generation and risk prioritization are not described on the pages reviewed.
Endor Labs: Reachability across dependencies, containers and code, and AURI agents write SAST fixes and open SCA upgrade pull requests behind approval gates. Ingestion of third-party scanner findings is not confirmed.
How do they compare on price?
Backslash Security: free tier: No (free read-only AI Endpoint Exposure Assessment); lowest published paid option: AWS Marketplace: $75,000 annual commit, 12 months (marketplace price); pricing unit: Annual commit.
Endor Labs: free tier: Yes: Developer tier, local, no account; lowest published paid option: Contact sales; pricing unit: Contributors with commits in the last 90 days.
Source: Backslash Security pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: Endor Labs pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Backslash Security if governance and policy control and endpoint deployment and tamper resistance matter most: Backslash scores 5.0 and 4.0 there, against 4.5 and 2.5 for Endor Labs. Choose Endor Labs if AI code and assistant coverage and remediation and ASPM depth matter most: Endor Labs scores 5.0 and 4.5 there, against 4.5 and 3.0 for Backslash.
Frequently asked questions
Is Backslash Security or Endor Labs better for AI code security?
Backslash Security and Endor Labs share a displayed score of 3.9; on the exact weighted total Endor Labs is ahead, 3.900 against 3.875. Backslash leads on 2 of 6 criteria and Endor Labs on 3; 1 is tied. Which is better depends on which criteria matter most to you; the calculator on this site re-weights them.
How do Backslash Security and Endor Labs price their plans?
Backslash Security: free tier: No (free read-only AI Endpoint Exposure Assessment); lowest published paid option: AWS Marketplace: $75,000 annual commit, 12 months (marketplace price). Endor Labs: free tier: Yes: Developer tier, local, no account; lowest published paid option: Contact sales. Prices as published on vendor pages and marketplace listings, reviewed 2026-10-11.
Which AI coding assistants do Backslash Security and Endor Labs name?
On the pages we reviewed, Backslash Security names Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Windsurf and Endor Labs names Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex. 'Not named' means we did not find the assistant on the vendor's pages; it does not prove the tool cannot work with it.
Read the full reviews
Where next?
- Backslash Security alternatives
- Endor Labs alternatives
- Compare Backslash Security and Endor Labs with other tools
- Re-weight the criteria in the calculator
More head-to-heads
- Legit Security vs Backslash Security
- Legit Security vs Endor Labs
- Backslash Security vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Backslash Security vs OX Security
- Backslash Security vs Cycode
Sources reviewed
Backslash Security
Last reviewed October 2026. Editorial assessment from public vendor material; no hands-on testing.