Cycode vs OX Security for AI code security
ANSWER FIRST
OX Security scores 3.8 and Cycode 3.7. Cycode leads on endpoint deployment and on remediation and ASPM depth; OX leads on governance and policy control and on pricing and buying clarity; they tie on AI code and assistant coverage and developer experience.
Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026
How do Cycode and OX Security score side by side?
| Criterion | Weight | Cycode | OX Security | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage of AI-generated code and AI coding assistants | 25% | 4.5 | 4.5 | Tie |
| Endpoint deployment and tamper resistance | 20% | 3.0 | 2.5 | Cycode |
| Governance and policy control for the CISO | 20% | 4.0 | 4.5 | OX |
| Developer experience and low friction | 15% | 3.5 | 3.5 | Tie |
| Pricing and buying clarity | 10% | 1.5 | 2.5 | OX |
| Remediation and ASPM depth | 10% | 5.0 | 4.5 | Cycode |
| Weighted total | 3.7 | 3.8 |
Cycode leads on 2 criteria, OX Security leads on 2, and 2 are tied.
Cycode
diff --verdict cycode · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:IDE guardrails intercept secrets, file context, prompts and tool calls before they reach AI services. [source]
- Strength:AI-BOM tracks .cursorrules and .windsurfrules files, MCP servers and AI API keys, with commit provenance. [source]
- Strength:AI Exploitability Agent confirms CVE reachability; AI Fix Agent produces PR-ready fixes. [source]
- Strength:Full scanner set: SAST, SCA, secrets, containers, IaC and CI/CD posture. [source]
- Strength:Cycode's AI Guardrails names Claude Code and Cursor. [source]
@@ limitations @@
- Limitation:No prices published; pricing is based on active developers and AI usage. [source]
OX Security
diff --verdict ox-security · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:VibeSec analyzes the developer's prompt and sends security guidance to the agent before code is generated. [source]
- Strength:Supports Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro and VS Code with Copilot. [source]
- Strength:Malicious dependency blocking, secret protection, AI inventory and an agent activity log. [source]
- Strength:Pricing unit published for each product, including per AI user for VibeSec. [source]
@@ limitations @@
How do they handle coding agents?
Both score 4.5 on AI code and assistant coverage with different methods. Cycode intercepts secrets, prompts and tool calls at the IDE and keeps an AI-BOM of rule files, MCP servers and AI API keys. OX VibeSec analyzes the developer's prompt and sends security guidance to the agent before it writes, and adds malicious dependency blocking and secret protection. Both name Claude Code: OX in its VibeSec documentation, Cycode for its AI Guardrails.
Which gives the security team more control?
OX lets security teams allow or block specific MCP tools, SaaS integrations and models and keeps an Agent Activity Log of prompts and tool calls. Cycode gives AI tools and MCP servers three authorization states and enforces MCP guardrails through IDE hooks for Cursor and Claude Code.
How do they rank and fix findings?
Cycode's AI Exploitability Agent confirms whether a CVE is reachable. OX correlates findings across its platform and its Agentic Pentester ties exploitable issues back to code and APIs.
How do they compare on price?
Neither lists prices. OX publishes a pricing unit per product (per AI user for VibeSec). Cycode names its tiers and says pricing depends on active developers and AI usage. OX's terms allow free use up to 9 developer contributions.
Which should you choose?
Choose Cycode for a detailed AI artifact inventory and exploitability checks on dependencies. Choose OX Security to influence what agents write at the prompt stage, especially on Claude Code or Kiro.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Cycode or OX Security?
OX Security scores slightly higher, 3.8 against 3.7, with leads in governance and buying clarity. Cycode leads on endpoint deployment and remediation depth.
Do Cycode and OX Security support Claude Code?
OX Security's VibeSec documentation lists Claude Code. Cycode's AI page names Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf and Tabnine, and Cycode's AI Guardrails blog post of 17 February 2026 names Claude Code and Cursor.
Read the full reviews
Where next?
- Cycode alternatives
- OX Security alternatives
- Compare Cycode and OX Security with other tools
- Re-weight the criteria in the calculator
More head-to-heads
- Legit Security vs OX Security
- Legit Security vs Cycode
- OX Security vs Snyk
- Cycode vs Snyk
- Backslash Security vs OX Security
- Backslash Security vs Cycode
Sources reviewed
Cycode
OX Security
Last reviewed October 2026. Editorial assessment from public vendor material; no hands-on testing.