Semgrep vs Snyk for AI code security
ANSWER FIRST
Semgrep scores 3.5 and Snyk 4.1 on our AI code security criteria, so Snyk ranks higher on the published weights. Semgrep leads on pricing and buying clarity; Snyk leads on AI code and assistant coverage and governance and policy control; they tie on endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, developer experience and remediation and ASPM depth. The widest gap is AI code and assistant coverage, where Snyk scores 5.0 against 3.5.
Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026
How do Semgrep and Snyk score side by side?
| Criterion | Weight | Semgrep | Snyk | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage of AI-generated code and AI coding assistants | 25% | 3.5 | 5.0 | Snyk |
| Endpoint deployment and tamper resistance | 20% | 3.0 | 3.0 | Tie |
| Governance and policy control for the CISO | 20% | 2.5 | 4.0 | Snyk |
| Developer experience and low friction | 15% | 4.5 | 4.5 | Tie |
| Pricing and buying clarity | 10% | 4.0 | 3.5 | Semgrep |
| Remediation and ASPM depth | 10% | 4.0 | 4.0 | Tie |
| Weighted total | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Semgrep leads on 1 criteria, Snyk leads on 2, and 3 are tied.
Semgrep
diff --verdict semgrep · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:Free for up to 10 contributors and 10 private repositories. [source]
- Strength:Teams priced at $30 per contributor per month (Code or Supply Chain) and $15 for Secrets. [source]
- Strength:Semgrep Guardian runs an MCP server and hooks that fire on every file write in Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf. [source]
- Strength:Guardian blocks malicious dependencies and hardcoded credentials at generation time. [source]
@@ limitations @@
Snyk
diff --verdict snyk · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:Free plan with SCA, SAST, IaC and container scanning and IDE, CLI and SCM integrations. [source]
- Strength:Team plan published at a starting price of $25 a month for up to 10 developers. [source]
- Strength:Evo Agentic Development Security names Claude, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, Antigravity, Kiro and Qodo. [source]
- Strength:Evo can evaluate, steer or block risky agent activity before it executes. [source]
@@ limitations @@
How do Semgrep and Snyk cover AI code and coding assistants?
Semgrep: Semgrep Guardian scans inside Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf as code is written; org-wide discovery of assistants or MCP servers is not described and Copilot is not listed.
Snyk: Evo Agentic Development Security names Claude, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, Antigravity, Kiro and Qodo, discovers MCP servers, skills and tools, and secures code inside the agent. Snyk Studio's MCP server lists Copilot among supported AI tools.
Assistants named on their public pages: Semgrep: Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf; Snyk: Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex and Kiro.
Where do their controls run on the developer machine?
Semgrep: Guardian runs on the developer machine as an MCP server, hooks on every file write and skills; tamper resistance is not described.
Snyk: Evo coding agent security is metered per active machine per day and can evaluate, steer or block agent activity; an endpoint application and tamper resistance are not described on the pages reviewed.
How much control does the security team get?
Semgrep: Guardian enforces checks per agent, but the pages reviewed show no central inventory or policy over which agents and MCP servers may run.
Snyk: Evo can evaluate, steer or block risky agent activity across discovered MCP servers, skills and tools. It requires an Enterprise subscription, and audit reporting on agent activity is not described on the pages reviewed.
How do they fit the developer's workflow?
Semgrep: Free for up to 10 contributors and 10 private repos, with VS Code and JetBrains support.
Snyk: The Free plan includes IDE, CLI and source control integrations, and Snyk Studio brings scanning into AI tools through an MCP server.
How do they fix and prioritize findings?
Semgrep: Semgrep Assistant auto-triages findings, and remediation guidance appears in pull requests and IDEs.
Snyk: Risk Score weighs reachability, exploit maturity, business impact, EPSS and CVSS, and AI remediation uses an agentic retry loop. Ingestion of third-party scanner findings is not confirmed on the pages reviewed.
How do they compare on price?
Semgrep: free tier: Yes: up to 10 contributors; lowest published paid option: $30 per contributor per month (Code or Supply Chain); $15 (Secrets); pricing unit: Contributor.
Snyk: free tier: Yes: Free, $0; lowest published paid option: Team from $25 a month (up to 10 developers); pricing unit: Enterprise credits (1 credit = $1).
Source: Semgrep pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: Snyk pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Semgrep if pricing and buying clarity and developer experience matter most: Semgrep scores 4.0 and 4.5 there, against 3.5 and 4.5 for Snyk. Choose Snyk if AI code and assistant coverage and governance and policy control matter most: Snyk scores 5.0 and 4.0 there, against 3.5 and 2.5 for Semgrep.
Frequently asked questions
Is Semgrep or Snyk better for AI code security?
Semgrep scores 3.5 and Snyk 4.1 on our AI code security criteria, so Snyk ranks higher on the published weights. Semgrep leads on 1 of 6 criteria and Snyk on 2; 3 are tied. Which is better depends on which criteria matter most to you; the calculator on this site re-weights them.
How do Semgrep and Snyk price their plans?
Semgrep: free tier: Yes: up to 10 contributors; lowest published paid option: $30 per contributor per month (Code or Supply Chain); $15 (Secrets). Snyk: free tier: Yes: Free, $0; lowest published paid option: Team from $25 a month (up to 10 developers). Prices as published on vendor pages and marketplace listings, reviewed 2026-10-11.
Which AI coding assistants do Semgrep and Snyk name?
On the pages we reviewed, Semgrep names Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf and Snyk names Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, OpenAI Codex and Kiro. 'Not named' means we did not find the assistant on the vendor's pages; it does not prove the tool cannot work with it.
Read the full reviews
Where next?
- Semgrep alternatives
- Snyk alternatives
- Compare Semgrep and Snyk with other tools
- Re-weight the criteria in the calculator
More head-to-heads
- Legit Security vs Snyk
- Legit Security vs Semgrep
- Backslash Security vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- OX Security vs Snyk
- Cycode vs Snyk
Sources reviewed
Snyk
Last reviewed October 2026. Editorial assessment from public vendor material; no hands-on testing.