Endor Labs vs OX Security for AI code security
ANSWER FIRST
Endor Labs scores 3.9 and OX Security 3.8 on our AI code security criteria, so Endor Labs ranks higher on the published weights. Endor Labs leads on AI code and assistant coverage and developer experience; OX leads on pricing and buying clarity; they tie on endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, governance and policy control and remediation and ASPM depth. The widest gap is AI code and assistant coverage, where Endor Labs scores 5.0 against 4.5.
Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026
How do Endor Labs and OX Security score side by side?
| Criterion | Weight | Endor Labs | OX Security | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage of AI-generated code and AI coding assistants | 25% | 5.0 | 4.5 | Endor Labs |
| Endpoint deployment and tamper resistance | 20% | 2.5 | 2.5 | Tie |
| Governance and policy control for the CISO | 20% | 4.5 | 4.5 | Tie |
| Developer experience and low friction | 15% | 4.0 | 3.5 | Endor Labs |
| Pricing and buying clarity | 10% | 2.0 | 2.5 | OX |
| Remediation and ASPM depth | 10% | 4.5 | 4.5 | Tie |
| Weighted total | 3.9 | 3.8 |
Endor Labs leads on 2 criteria, OX Security leads on 1, and 3 are tied.
Endor Labs
diff --verdict endor-labs · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:Reachability analysis across dependencies, containers and first-party code. [source]
- Strength:AURI inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills and applies policy at the moment of action. [source]
- Strength:MCP server for Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with Copilot, Codex and Antigravity. [source]
- Strength:Free Developer tier runs locally with no account. [source]
@@ limitations @@
OX Security
diff --verdict ox-security · reviewed 2026-09
@@ strengths @@
- Strength:VibeSec analyzes the developer's prompt and sends security guidance to the agent before code is generated. [source]
- Strength:Supports Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro and VS Code with Copilot. [source]
- Strength:Malicious dependency blocking, secret protection, AI inventory and an agent activity log. [source]
- Strength:Pricing unit published for each product, including per AI user for VibeSec. [source]
@@ limitations @@
How do Endor Labs and OX Security cover AI code and coding assistants?
Endor Labs: AURI inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills, and the MCP server installs into Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with Copilot, Codex and Antigravity. AI SAST traces dataflow across repositories and pull requests.
OX Security: VibeSec supports Claude Code, Cursor, Kiro and VS Code with Copilot and analyzes the prompt before code is generated; the Agent AI BOM lists MCP servers, external SaaS and AI models with their users.
Assistants named on their public pages: Endor Labs: Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex; OX Security: Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Kiro.
Where do their controls run on the developer machine?
Endor Labs: Runs locally through an MCP server (npx endorctl ai-tools mcp-server) and AURI agents that run inside Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex and Google Antigravity on customer infrastructure; an endpoint application and tamper resistance are not described.
OX Security: Runs as a VS Code extension, a JetBrains plugin and an MCP integration; an endpoint application and tamper resistance are not described.
How much control does the security team get?
Endor Labs: AURI applies policy at the moment of action with an audit trail, and mutating agent actions sit behind approval gates; scoping policy by team or machine is not described.
OX Security: Allow or block specific MCP tools, SaaS integrations and models, with an Agent Activity Log of prompts and tool calls and a history of prevented risks.
How do they fit the developer's workflow?
Endor Labs: The free Developer tier runs locally with no account.
OX Security: VS Code extension, JetBrains plugin and MCP integration, and free use for up to 9 developer contributions.
How do they fix and prioritize findings?
Endor Labs: Reachability across dependencies, containers and code, and AURI agents write SAST fixes and open SCA upgrade pull requests behind approval gates. Ingestion of third-party scanner findings is not confirmed.
OX Security: One-click AI fixes in CI/CD, IDEs and pull requests with diffs, ASPM correlation, and an Agentic Pentester that ties exploitable issues back to code.
How do they compare on price?
Endor Labs: free tier: Yes: Developer tier, local, no account; lowest published paid option: Contact sales; pricing unit: Contributors with commits in the last 90 days.
OX Security: free tier: Yes: free use up to 9 developer contributions; lowest published paid option: Contact sales; pricing unit: AI user, contributing developer, cloud asset, agent hours.
Source: Endor Labs pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: OX Security pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Endor Labs if AI code and assistant coverage and developer experience matter most: Endor Labs scores 5.0 and 4.0 there, against 4.5 and 3.5 for OX. Choose OX Security if pricing and buying clarity and AI code and assistant coverage matter most: OX scores 2.5 and 4.5 there, against 2.0 and 5.0 for Endor Labs.
Frequently asked questions
Is Endor Labs or OX Security better for AI code security?
Endor Labs scores 3.9 and OX Security 3.8 on our AI code security criteria, so Endor Labs ranks higher on the published weights. Endor Labs leads on 2 of 6 criteria and OX on 1; 3 are tied. Which is better depends on which criteria matter most to you; the calculator on this site re-weights them.
How do Endor Labs and OX Security price their plans?
Endor Labs: free tier: Yes: Developer tier, local, no account; lowest published paid option: Contact sales. OX Security: free tier: Yes: free use up to 9 developer contributions; lowest published paid option: Contact sales. Prices as published on vendor pages and marketplace listings, reviewed 2026-10-11.
Which AI coding assistants do Endor Labs and OX Security name?
On the pages we reviewed, Endor Labs names Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex and OX Security names Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Kiro. 'Not named' means we did not find the assistant on the vendor's pages; it does not prove the tool cannot work with it.
Read the full reviews
Where next?
- Endor Labs alternatives
- OX Security alternatives
- Compare Endor Labs and OX Security with other tools
- Re-weight the criteria in the calculator
More head-to-heads
- Legit Security vs Endor Labs
- Legit Security vs OX Security
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- OX Security vs Snyk
- Backslash Security vs Endor Labs
- Backslash Security vs OX Security
Sources reviewed
OX Security
Last reviewed October 2026. Editorial assessment from public vendor material; no hands-on testing.