{}Best AI Code Security

Endor Labs vs Semgrep for AI code security

ANSWER FIRST

Endor Labs scores 3.9 and Semgrep 3.5 on our AI code security criteria, so Endor Labs ranks higher on the published weights. Endor Labs leads on AI code and assistant coverage, governance and policy control and remediation and ASPM depth; Semgrep leads on endpoint deployment and tamper resistance, developer experience and pricing and buying clarity. The widest gap is governance and policy control, where Endor Labs scores 4.5 against 2.5.

Editorial assessment · Compiled from vendor product, docs, pricing and marketplace pages · Rated October 2026

How do Endor Labs and Semgrep score side by side?

Endor Labs and Semgrep: editorial assessment, 0-5. Last reviewed October 2026.
CriterionWeightEndor LabsSemgrepEdge
Coverage of AI-generated code and AI coding assistants25%5.03.5Endor Labs
Endpoint deployment and tamper resistance20%2.53.0Semgrep
Governance and policy control for the CISO20%4.52.5Endor Labs
Developer experience and low friction15%4.04.5Semgrep
Pricing and buying clarity10%2.04.0Semgrep
Remediation and ASPM depth10%4.54.0Endor Labs
Weighted total3.93.5

Endor Labs leads on 3 criteria, Semgrep leads on 3, and 0 are tied.

Endor Labs

Verdict for Endor Labs: strengths and limitations

diff --verdict endor-labs · reviewed 2026-09

@@ strengths @@

  • Strength:Reachability analysis across dependencies, containers and first-party code. [source]
  • Strength:AURI inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills and applies policy at the moment of action. [source]
  • Strength:MCP server for Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with Copilot, Codex and Antigravity. [source]
  • Strength:Free Developer tier runs locally with no account. [source]

@@ limitations @@

  • Limitation:Core and Pro prices are not published. [source]
  • Limitation:Free tier has no UI, policies or scan history. [source]

Semgrep

Verdict for Semgrep: strengths and limitations

diff --verdict semgrep · reviewed 2026-09

@@ strengths @@

  • Strength:Free for up to 10 contributors and 10 private repositories. [source]
  • Strength:Teams priced at $30 per contributor per month (Code or Supply Chain) and $15 for Secrets. [source]
  • Strength:Semgrep Guardian runs an MCP server and hooks that fire on every file write in Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf. [source]
  • Strength:Guardian blocks malicious dependencies and hardcoded credentials at generation time. [source]

@@ limitations @@

  • Limitation:No org-wide discovery of assistants or MCP servers on the pages reviewed. [source]
  • Limitation:GitHub Copilot is not listed for Guardian; Guardian pricing not stated. [source]

How do Endor Labs and Semgrep cover AI code and coding assistants?

Endor Labs: AURI inventories coding agents, models, MCP servers and skills, and the MCP server installs into Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code with Copilot, Codex and Antigravity. AI SAST traces dataflow across repositories and pull requests.

Semgrep: Semgrep Guardian scans inside Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf as code is written; org-wide discovery of assistants or MCP servers is not described and Copilot is not listed.

Assistants named on their public pages: Endor Labs: Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex; Semgrep: Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf.

Where do their controls run on the developer machine?

Endor Labs: Runs locally through an MCP server (npx endorctl ai-tools mcp-server) and AURI agents that run inside Claude Code, Cursor, OpenAI Codex and Google Antigravity on customer infrastructure; an endpoint application and tamper resistance are not described.

Semgrep: Guardian runs on the developer machine as an MCP server, hooks on every file write and skills; tamper resistance is not described.

How much control does the security team get?

Endor Labs: AURI applies policy at the moment of action with an audit trail, and mutating agent actions sit behind approval gates; scoping policy by team or machine is not described.

Semgrep: Guardian enforces checks per agent, but the pages reviewed show no central inventory or policy over which agents and MCP servers may run.

How do they fit the developer's workflow?

Endor Labs: The free Developer tier runs locally with no account.

Semgrep: Free for up to 10 contributors and 10 private repos, with VS Code and JetBrains support.

How do they fix and prioritize findings?

Endor Labs: Reachability across dependencies, containers and code, and AURI agents write SAST fixes and open SCA upgrade pull requests behind approval gates. Ingestion of third-party scanner findings is not confirmed.

Semgrep: Semgrep Assistant auto-triages findings, and remediation guidance appears in pull requests and IDEs.

How do they compare on price?

Endor Labs: free tier: Yes: Developer tier, local, no account; lowest published paid option: Contact sales; pricing unit: Contributors with commits in the last 90 days.

Semgrep: free tier: Yes: up to 10 contributors; lowest published paid option: $30 per contributor per month (Code or Supply Chain); $15 (Secrets); pricing unit: Contributor.

Source: Endor Labs pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Source: Semgrep pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Which should you choose?

Choose Endor Labs if AI code and assistant coverage and governance and policy control matter most: Endor Labs scores 5.0 and 4.5 there, against 3.5 and 2.5 for Semgrep. Choose Semgrep if developer experience and pricing and buying clarity matter most: Semgrep scores 4.5 and 4.0 there, against 4.0 and 2.0 for Endor Labs.

Frequently asked questions

Is Endor Labs or Semgrep better for AI code security?

Endor Labs scores 3.9 and Semgrep 3.5 on our AI code security criteria, so Endor Labs ranks higher on the published weights. Endor Labs leads on 3 of 6 criteria and Semgrep on 3; 0 are tied. Which is better depends on which criteria matter most to you; the calculator on this site re-weights them.

How do Endor Labs and Semgrep price their plans?

Endor Labs: free tier: Yes: Developer tier, local, no account; lowest published paid option: Contact sales. Semgrep: free tier: Yes: up to 10 contributors; lowest published paid option: $30 per contributor per month (Code or Supply Chain); $15 (Secrets). Prices as published on vendor pages and marketplace listings, reviewed 2026-10-11.

Which AI coding assistants do Endor Labs and Semgrep name?

On the pages we reviewed, Endor Labs names Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot and OpenAI Codex and Semgrep names Claude Code, Cursor and Windsurf. 'Not named' means we did not find the assistant on the vendor's pages; it does not prove the tool cannot work with it.

Read the full reviews

Where next?

More head-to-heads

Sources reviewed

Last reviewed October 2026. Editorial assessment from public vendor material; no hands-on testing.